Age Group Comparison
Cardiff 2025 - S8 • Hyrox Doubles Mixed
Comparison Scope:
16-29 Age Group Average
Place: N/A
Time: 1:19:01
Country: (264 athletes)
Percentile: 50.0th
Category Comparison
Bars show relative strength advantage based on performance vs expected baseline (longer = bigger advantage)
aerobic
Sam: +2.2% |
16-29 Age Group: +0.0%
Sam
2.2%
16-29 Age Group
strength
Sam: -3.7% |
16-29 Age Group: +0.0%
Sam
3.7%
16-29 Age Group
running
Sam: -15.9% |
16-29 Age Group: +0.0%
Sam
15.9%
16-29 Age Group
Exercise Breakdown - Relative Performance
| Exercise | Category | Sam (vs Expected) | 16-29 Age Group (vs Expected) | Better Performance | Visual |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| SkiErg | aerobic | 4:47 (+2.2%) | 4:19 (+0.0%) |
16-29 Age Group
+2.2% better
|
|
| Total Running | running | 38:09 (-15.9%) | 39:21 (+0.0%) |
Sam
+15.9% better
|
|
| Farmers Carry | strength | 1:28 (-30.1%) | 1:46 (+0.0%) |
Sam
+30.1% better
|
|
| Sandbag Lunges | strength | 4:15 (-11.1%) | 3:38 (+0.0%) |
Sam
+11.1% better
|
|
| Sled Pull | strength | 5:10 (+9.1%) | 3:55 (+0.0%) |
16-29 Age Group
+9.1% better
|
|
| Sled Push | strength | 1:59 (-17.8%) | 1:58 (+0.0%) |
Sam
+17.8% better
|
|
| Wall Balls | strength | 7:16 (+31.5%) | 4:39 (+0.0%) |
16-29 Age Group
+31.5% better
|
|
How to Read This Comparison
- • Relative Performance Mode: Compares how each athlete performed vs their expected baseline
- • Variance %: Positive = slower than expected, Negative = faster than expected
- • Advantage: Difference in variance percentages (who performed better relative to expectations)
- • Use Case: Identify relative strengths/weaknesses - who's better at a category relative to their overall fitness level
- • Diverging Bars: Bar extends toward the athlete with the advantage in that category/exercise
- • Colors: Blue = Sam, Orange = 16-29 Age Group