Age Group Comparison

Cardiff 2025 - S8 • Hyrox Doubles Women

Nia Jordan

Place: 695
Time: 1:38:56
Country:
Percentile: 91.6th
View detailed analysis →

16-29 Age Group Average

Place: N/A
Time: 1:23:14
Country: (323 athletes)
Percentile: 50.0th

Category Comparison

Bars show relative strength advantage based on performance vs expected baseline (longer = bigger advantage)

aerobic Nia: -5.0% | 16-29 Age Group: +0.0%
Nia
5.0%
16-29 Age Group
strength Nia: +5.6% | 16-29 Age Group: +0.0%
Nia
5.6%
16-29 Age Group
running Nia: -3.1% | 16-29 Age Group: +0.0%
Nia
3.1%
16-29 Age Group

Exercise Breakdown - Relative Performance

Exercise Category Nia (vs Expected) 16-29 Age Group (vs Expected) Better Performance Visual
Burpee Broad Jump aerobic 5:14 (-14.0%) 4:32 (+0.0%)
Nia +14.0% better
Row aerobic 5:32 (-3.1%) 5:10 (+0.0%)
Nia +3.1% better
SkiErg aerobic 5:20 (+2.2%) 4:48 (+0.0%)
16-29 Age Group +2.2% better
Total Running running 47:25 (-3.1%) 41:08 (+0.0%)
Nia +3.1% better
Farmers Carry strength 2:01 (-8.0%) 1:49 (+0.0%)
Nia +8.0% better
Sandbag Lunges strength 5:28 (+22.8%) 3:24 (+0.0%)
16-29 Age Group +22.8% better
Sled Pull strength 5:09 (+4.2%) 3:58 (+0.0%)
16-29 Age Group +4.2% better
Sled Push strength 2:08 (+2.5%) 1:42 (+0.0%)
16-29 Age Group +2.5% better
Wall Balls strength 5:23 (+6.8%) 4:15 (+0.0%)
16-29 Age Group +6.8% better

How to Read This Comparison