Age Group Comparison
Cardiff 2025 - S8 • Hyrox Doubles Women
Comparison Scope:
16-29 Age Group Average
Place: N/A
Time: 1:23:14
Country: (323 athletes)
Percentile: 50.0th
Category Comparison
Bars show absolute time advantage - who was faster in raw time (longer = bigger advantage)
aerobic
Niamh: 6:26 |
16-29 Age Group: 4:50
Niamh
24.9%
16-29 Age Group
strength
Niamh: 4:02 |
16-29 Age Group: 3:01
Niamh
25.2%
16-29 Age Group
running
Niamh: 56:45 |
16-29 Age Group: 41:08
Niamh
27.5%
16-29 Age Group
Exercise Breakdown - Absolute Times
| Exercise | Category | Niamh (Time) | 16-29 Age Group (Time) | Faster Time | Visual |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Burpee Broad Jump | aerobic | 8:22 | 4:32 |
16-29 Age Group
45.8% faster
|
|
| Row | aerobic | 5:39 | 5:10 |
16-29 Age Group
8.6% faster
|
|
| SkiErg | aerobic | 5:17 | 4:48 |
16-29 Age Group
9.1% faster
|
|
| Total Running | running | 56:45 | 41:08 |
16-29 Age Group
27.5% faster
|
|
| Farmers Carry | strength | 2:13 | 1:49 |
16-29 Age Group
18.0% faster
|
|
| Sandbag Lunges | strength | 4:49 | 3:24 |
16-29 Age Group
29.4% faster
|
|
| Sled Pull | strength | 5:53 | 3:58 |
16-29 Age Group
32.6% faster
|
|
| Sled Push | strength | 2:05 | 1:42 |
16-29 Age Group
18.4% faster
|
|
| Wall Balls | strength | 5:14 | 4:15 |
16-29 Age Group
18.8% faster
|
|
How to Read This Comparison
- • Absolute Time Mode: Direct comparison of raw times between athletes
- • Advantage: Percentage time difference (who was faster in absolute terms)
- • Use Case: See who actually completed each segment faster, regardless of expected performance
- • Diverging Bars: Bar extends toward the athlete with the advantage in that category/exercise
- • Colors: Blue = Niamh, Orange = 16-29 Age Group