Age Group Comparison
Cardiff 2025 - S8 • Hyrox Pro Doubles Women
Comparison Scope:
16-29 Age Group Average
Place: N/A
Time: 1:20:28
Country: (34 athletes)
Percentile: 50.0th
Category Comparison
Bars show relative strength advantage based on performance vs expected baseline (longer = bigger advantage)
aerobic
Ruth: +4.4% |
16-29 Age Group: +0.0%
Ruth
4.4%
16-29 Age Group
strength
Ruth: -3.1% |
16-29 Age Group: +0.0%
Ruth
3.1%
16-29 Age Group
running
Ruth: +1.3% |
16-29 Age Group: +0.0%
Ruth
1.3%
16-29 Age Group
Exercise Breakdown - Relative Performance
| Exercise | Category | Ruth (vs Expected) | 16-29 Age Group (vs Expected) | Better Performance | Visual |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Burpee Broad Jump | aerobic | 4:31 (+10.5%) | 4:23 (+0.0%) |
16-29 Age Group
+10.5% better
|
|
| Row | aerobic | 5:01 (+2.0%) | 4:59 (+0.0%) |
16-29 Age Group
+2.0% better
|
|
| SkiErg | aerobic | 4:34 (+0.5%) | 4:33 (+0.0%) |
16-29 Age Group
+0.5% better
|
|
| Total Running | running | 36:38 (+1.3%) | 37:54 (+0.0%) |
16-29 Age Group
+1.3% better
|
|
| Farmers Carry | strength | 1:52 (-2.9%) | 2:02 (+0.0%) |
Ruth
+2.9% better
|
|
| Sandbag Lunges | strength | 4:04 (+2.5%) | 3:54 (+0.0%) |
16-29 Age Group
+2.5% better
|
|
| Sled Pull | strength | 4:22 (-6.5%) | 4:47 (+0.0%) |
Ruth
+6.5% better
|
|
| Sled Push | strength | 2:22 (+2.0%) | 2:18 (+0.0%) |
16-29 Age Group
+2.0% better
|
|
| Wall Balls | strength | 3:45 (-10.4%) | 4:59 (+0.0%) |
Ruth
+10.4% better
|
|
How to Read This Comparison
- • Relative Performance Mode: Compares how each athlete performed vs their expected baseline
- • Variance %: Positive = slower than expected, Negative = faster than expected
- • Advantage: Difference in variance percentages (who performed better relative to expectations)
- • Use Case: Identify relative strengths/weaknesses - who's better at a category relative to their overall fitness level
- • Diverging Bars: Bar extends toward the athlete with the advantage in that category/exercise
- • Colors: Blue = Ruth, Orange = 16-29 Age Group