Age Group Comparison
Riga/Rīga 2025 - S8 • Hyrox Doubles Men
Comparison Scope:
16-29 Age Group Average
Place: N/A
Time: 1:15:23
Country: (1158 athletes)
Percentile: 50.0th
Category Comparison
Bars show relative strength advantage based on performance vs expected baseline (longer = bigger advantage)
aerobic
Jim: +3.6% |
16-29 Age Group: +0.0%
Jim
3.6%
16-29 Age Group
strength
Jim: +2.5% |
16-29 Age Group: +0.0%
Jim
2.5%
16-29 Age Group
running
Jim: -1.8% |
16-29 Age Group: +0.0%
Jim
1.8%
16-29 Age Group
Exercise Breakdown - Relative Performance
| Exercise | Category | Jim (vs Expected) | 16-29 Age Group (vs Expected) | Better Performance | Visual |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Burpee Broad Jump | aerobic | 3:40 (+6.7%) | 3:07 (+0.0%) |
16-29 Age Group
+6.7% better
|
|
| Row | aerobic | 4:18 (-4.7%) | 4:30 (+0.0%) |
Jim
+4.7% better
|
|
| SkiErg | aerobic | 4:23 (+8.9%) | 4:03 (+0.0%) |
16-29 Age Group
+8.9% better
|
|
| Total Running | running | 39:22 (-1.8%) | 37:00 (+0.0%) |
Jim
+1.8% better
|
|
| Farmers Carry | strength | 1:32 (-7.1%) | 1:41 (+0.0%) |
Jim
+7.1% better
|
|
| Sandbag Lunges | strength | 3:55 (+9.9%) | 3:25 (+0.0%) |
16-29 Age Group
+9.9% better
|
|
| Sled Pull | strength | 3:20 (+5.9%) | 3:12 (+0.0%) |
16-29 Age Group
+5.9% better
|
|
| Sled Push | strength | 1:29 (-3.7%) | 1:44 (+0.0%) |
Jim
+3.7% better
|
|
| Wall Balls | strength | 4:36 (+7.4%) | 4:29 (+0.0%) |
16-29 Age Group
+7.4% better
|
|
How to Read This Comparison
- • Relative Performance Mode: Compares how each athlete performed vs their expected baseline
- • Variance %: Positive = slower than expected, Negative = faster than expected
- • Advantage: Difference in variance percentages (who performed better relative to expectations)
- • Use Case: Identify relative strengths/weaknesses - who's better at a category relative to their overall fitness level
- • Diverging Bars: Bar extends toward the athlete with the advantage in that category/exercise
- • Colors: Blue = Jim, Orange = 16-29 Age Group