Age Group Comparison

Riga/Rīga 2025 - S8 • Hyrox Pro Doubles Women

Lovise Lang

Place: 1
Time: 1:06:09
Country:
Percentile: 4.2th
View detailed analysis →

16-29 Age Group Average

Place: N/A
Time: 1:26:37
Country: (4 athletes)
Percentile: 50.0th

Category Comparison

Bars show relative strength advantage based on performance vs expected baseline (longer = bigger advantage)

aerobic Lovise: +5.7% | 16-29 Age Group: +0.0%
Lovise
5.7%
16-29 Age Group
strength Lovise: +3.6% | 16-29 Age Group: +0.0%
Lovise
3.6%
16-29 Age Group
running Lovise: +4.0% | 16-29 Age Group: +0.0%
Lovise
4.0%
16-29 Age Group

Exercise Breakdown - Relative Performance

Exercise Category Lovise (vs Expected) 16-29 Age Group (vs Expected) Better Performance Visual
Burpee Broad Jump aerobic 3:01 (+15.7%) 4:17 (+0.0%)
16-29 Age Group +15.7% better
Row aerobic 4:32 (+0.6%) 4:51 (+0.0%)
16-29 Age Group +0.6% better
SkiErg aerobic 4:12 (+0.7%) 4:29 (+0.0%)
16-29 Age Group +0.7% better
Total Running running 32:18 (+4.0%) 43:48 (+0.0%)
16-29 Age Group +4.0% better
Farmers Carry strength 1:29 (-8.1%) 1:47 (+0.0%)
Lovise +8.1% better
Sandbag Lunges strength 3:13 (+9.1%) 4:05 (+0.0%)
16-29 Age Group +9.1% better
Sled Pull strength 3:26 (-2.6%) 4:37 (+0.0%)
Lovise +2.6% better
Sled Push strength 2:00 (+18.8%) 2:08 (+0.0%)
16-29 Age Group +18.8% better
Wall Balls strength 3:34 (+0.9%) 4:14 (+0.0%)
16-29 Age Group +0.9% better

How to Read This Comparison