Age Group Comparison
Cardiff 2025 - S8 • Hyrox Doubles Mixed
Comparison Scope:
16-29 Age Group Average
Place: N/A
Time: 1:23:02
Country: (1295 athletes)
Percentile: 50.0th
Category Comparison
Bars show relative strength advantage based on performance vs expected baseline (longer = bigger advantage)
aerobic
James: +18.7% |
16-29 Age Group: +0.0%
James
18.7%
16-29 Age Group
strength
James: +19.9% |
16-29 Age Group: +0.0%
James
19.9%
16-29 Age Group
running
James: +96.8% |
16-29 Age Group: +0.0%
James
96.8%
16-29 Age Group
Exercise Breakdown - Relative Performance
| Exercise | Category | James (vs Expected) | 16-29 Age Group (vs Expected) | Better Performance | Visual |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Burpee Broad Jump | aerobic | 3:38 (+32.4%) | 3:28 (+0.0%) |
16-29 Age Group
+32.4% better
|
|
| Row | aerobic | 4:53 (+14.8%) | 4:46 (+0.0%) |
16-29 Age Group
+14.8% better
|
|
| SkiErg | aerobic | 4:20 (+8.9%) | 4:19 (+0.0%) |
16-29 Age Group
+8.9% better
|
|
| Total Running | running | 59:58 (+96.8%) | 40:17 (+0.0%) |
16-29 Age Group
+96.8% better
|
|
| Farmers Carry | strength | 1:44 (+20.4%) | 1:51 (+0.0%) |
16-29 Age Group
+20.4% better
|
|
| Sandbag Lunges | strength | 3:17 (+21.4%) | 3:54 (+0.0%) |
16-29 Age Group
+21.4% better
|
|
| Wall Balls | strength | 4:01 (+17.8%) | 4:47 (+0.0%) |
16-29 Age Group
+17.8% better
|
|
How to Read This Comparison
- • Relative Performance Mode: Compares how each athlete performed vs their expected baseline
- • Variance %: Positive = slower than expected, Negative = faster than expected
- • Advantage: Difference in variance percentages (who performed better relative to expectations)
- • Use Case: Identify relative strengths/weaknesses - who's better at a category relative to their overall fitness level
- • Diverging Bars: Bar extends toward the athlete with the advantage in that category/exercise
- • Colors: Blue = James, Orange = 16-29 Age Group