Age Group Comparison
Cardiff 2025 - S8 • Hyrox Doubles Women
Comparison Scope:
16-29 Age Group Average
Place: N/A
Time: 1:26:16
Country: (1345 athletes)
Percentile: 50.0th
Category Comparison
Bars show relative strength advantage based on performance vs expected baseline (longer = bigger advantage)
aerobic
Flora: +1.3% |
16-29 Age Group: +0.0%
Flora
1.3%
16-29 Age Group
strength
Flora: +2.4% |
16-29 Age Group: +0.0%
Flora
2.4%
16-29 Age Group
running
Flora: -2.5% |
16-29 Age Group: +0.0%
Flora
2.5%
16-29 Age Group
Exercise Breakdown - Relative Performance
| Exercise | Category | Flora (vs Expected) | 16-29 Age Group (vs Expected) | Better Performance | Visual |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Burpee Broad Jump | aerobic | 5:23 (+9.6%) | 4:06 (+0.0%) |
16-29 Age Group
+9.6% better
|
|
| Row | aerobic | 5:19 (+0.2%) | 5:09 (+0.0%) |
16-29 Age Group
+0.2% better
|
|
| SkiErg | aerobic | 4:37 (-5.7%) | 4:45 (+0.0%) |
Flora
+5.7% better
|
|
| Total Running | running | 41:40 (-2.5%) | 42:41 (+0.0%) |
Flora
+2.5% better
|
|
| Farmers Carry | strength | 1:53 (-1.4%) | 1:52 (+0.0%) |
Flora
+1.4% better
|
|
| Sandbag Lunges | strength | 3:57 (+6.6%) | 3:34 (+0.0%) |
16-29 Age Group
+6.6% better
|
|
| Sled Pull | strength | 4:08 (-1.1%) | 3:54 (+0.0%) |
Flora
+1.1% better
|
|
| Sled Push | strength | 1:25 (-20.9%) | 1:48 (+0.0%) |
Flora
+20.9% better
|
|
| Wall Balls | strength | 5:38 (+29.1%) | 4:25 (+0.0%) |
16-29 Age Group
+29.1% better
|
|
How to Read This Comparison
- • Relative Performance Mode: Compares how each athlete performed vs their expected baseline
- • Variance %: Positive = slower than expected, Negative = faster than expected
- • Advantage: Difference in variance percentages (who performed better relative to expectations)
- • Use Case: Identify relative strengths/weaknesses - who's better at a category relative to their overall fitness level
- • Diverging Bars: Bar extends toward the athlete with the advantage in that category/exercise
- • Colors: Blue = Flora, Orange = 16-29 Age Group